The Community for Technology Leaders
(2018)
to
ISSN:
ISBN:
pp: 221-239
Giridhari Venkatadri , Northeastern University
Yabing Liu , Northeastern University
Alan Mislove , Northeastern University
Patrick Loiseau , Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LIG and MPI-SWS
Oana Goga , Univ. Grenoble Alpes, CNRS, Inria, Grenoble INP, LIG
ABSTRACT
Sites like Facebook and Google now serve as de facto data brokers, aggregating data on users for the purpose of implementing powerful advertising platforms. Historically, these services allowed advertisers to select which users see their ads via targeting attributes. Recently, most advertising platforms have begun allowing advertisers to target users directly by uploading the personal information of the users who they wish to advertise to (e.g., their names, email addresses, phone numbers, etc.); these services are often known as custom audiences. Custom audiences effectively represent powerful linking mechanisms, allowing advertisers to leverage any PII (e.g., from customer data, public records, etc.) to target users. In this paper, we focus on Facebook's custom audience implementation and demonstrate attacks that allow an adversary to exploit the interface to infer users' PII as well as to infer their activity. Specifically, we show how the adversary can infer users' full phone numbers knowing just their email address, determine whether a particular user visited a website, and de-anonymize all the visitors to a website by inferring their phone numbers en masse. These attacks can be conducted without any interaction with the victim(s), cannot be detected by the victim(s), and do not require the adversary to spend money or actually place an ad. We propose a simple and effective fix to the attacks based on reworking the way Facebook de-duplicates uploaded information. Facebook's security team acknowledged the vulnerability and has put into place a fix that is a variant of the fix we propose. Overall, our results indicate that advertising platforms need to carefully consider the privacy implications of their interfaces.
INDEX TERMS
CITATION
REFERENCES
(Ver 3.3 (11022016))