Advanced Search
CS Search Google Search
Subscribers, please login

Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract

2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'03)   p. 120
An experiment on software project size and effort estimation

Full Article Text: Download PDF of full textBuy this articleGet full text from IEEE Xplore

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ISESE.2003.1237971
Send link to a friend

Abstract
Expert judgement is still the dominant estimation technique in practice today for software project size and effort. In this paper, we evaluate two techniques that are frequently suggested as effective support for human estimators: checklists and group discussions. A student experiment was conducted to investigate how checklists and group discussions help estimators to improve their estimates. The results suggest that both checklists and group discussions significantly contribute to improved estimation, but in distinct and complementary ways.
Additional Information

Citation:  Ursula Passing, Martin Shepperd, "An experiment on software project size and effort estimation," isese, p. 120,  2003 International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'03),  2003

Similar Articles

Abstract Contents
Abstract
Citation




Free access to

  • Abstracts
  • Selected PDFs

Electronic subscribers login to:

  • Access HTML/PDFs of full text articles

Subscription information

Get a Web account

PDFs require Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Peer Review Notice

Give us Feedback