Advanced Search
CS Search Google Search
Subscribers, please login

Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract

2004 International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP'04)   pp. 169-176
Performance Models for Evaluation and Automatic Tuning of Symmetric Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiply

Full Article Text: Download PDF of full textBuy this article

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/ICPP.2004.1327917
Send link to a friend

Abstract
We present optimizations for sparse matrix-vector multiply SpMV and its generalization to multiple vectors, SpMM, when the matrix is symmetric: (1) symmetric storage, (2) register blocking, and (3) vector blocking. Combined with register blocking, symmetry saves more than 50% in matrix storage. We also show performance speedups of 2.1× for SpMV and 2.6× for SpMM, when compared to the best non-symmetric register blocked implementation. We present an approach for the selection of tuning parameters, based on empirical modeling and search that consists of three steps: (1) Off-line benchmark, (2) Runtime search, and (3) Heuristic performance model. This approach generally selects parameters to achieve performance with 85% of that achieved with exhaustive search. We evaluate our implementations with respect to upper bounds on performance. Our model bounds performance by considering only the cost of memory operations and using lower bounds on the number of cache misses. Our optimized codes are within 68% of the upper bounds.
Additional Information

Citation:  Benjamin C. Lee, Richard W. Vuduc, James W. Demmel, Katherine A. Yelick, "Performance Models for Evaluation and Automatic Tuning of Symmetric Sparse Matrix-Vector Multiply," icpp, pp. 169-176,  2004 International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP'04),  2004

Similar Articles

Abstract Contents
Abstract
Citation




Free access to

  • Abstracts
  • Selected PDFs

Electronic subscribers login to:

  • Access HTML/PDFs of full text articles

Subscription information

Get a Web account

PDFs require Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Peer Review Notice

Give us Feedback