Published Articles >> Table of Contents >> Abstract

Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'00)   p. 428
Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective
B. Henderson-Sellers, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
R. Due, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
I. Graham, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia
G. Collins, Univ. of Technol., Sydney, NSW, Australia

Full Article Text:

DOI Bookmark: http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/APSEC.2000.896730
Send link to a friend

Abstract
Second generation OO methods, with a few exceptions, contained no elements addressing process or project management. Third generation methods have been defined as those collaborative developments which also have a significant process element. Two examples are the rational unified process (RUP) and object-oriented process, environment and notation (OPEN). We examine RUP and OPEN from a project management viewpoint and evaluate whether either or both would meet acceptable standards in process support, project management guidelines and full lifecycle description for OO software development.
Back to Top Additional Information
Index Terms- project management; object-oriented methods; software development management; third generation object-oriented processes; RUP; OPEN; project management; rational unified process; object-oriented process environment and notation; process support; full lifecycle description; object-oriented software development Citation:  B. Henderson-Sellers, R. Due, I. Graham, G. Collins, "Third generation OO processes: a critique of RUP and OPEN from a project management perspective," apsec, p. 428,  Seventh Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC'00),  2000